Ethereum: Would a reduced block generation time make the Finney attack more difficult?

** Ethereum: due to shortening

The Ethereum community fought against Finney attacks, also known as “dual expenses” or “fud” attack. This type of attack includes the attacker’s preceding block, which includes contradictory operations that can later be used to steal funds from other consumer wallets. The traditional solution to this risk reduction is to increase the time of block formation (BGT), but the recently proposed proposal shows that BGT reduction can make Finney attack more complex.

What is the Finney attack?

The Finney attack is a weakness of the Ethereum protocol, which allows the attacker to create a contradictory measure and use it to use it from other consumer wallets. This can lose up to 100 % stolen funds, which makes it a significant threat to the stability of the Ethereum network.

Traditional solution: Increased block production -ing time

The traditional solution to Finney’s attack is to increase BGT to complicate the attacker before the conflicting block. Adding BGT consumers are encouraged to strengthen events in time and are less likely to become a victim of this type of attack.

Reduced Block Generation Time: New Offer

A recent proposal shows that reducing BGT, Finney attack can be more difficult for a number of reasons:

1

2.

• Increased time to resolve conflicts : Reducing BGT can take longer to resolve conflicts, which gives the attacker more time to take advantage of them.

Softening the risk of Finney attack

Although the reduction of BGT, the Finney attack may be more complex, there are still a few steps that can be performed to soften the following risks:

• Increasing user certification : Implementing strong user check processes can help reduce the likelihood of incorrect startup and general security of the network.

2.

• Monitoring of Conflicts

  

  : Regular monitoring of the Ethereum block of circuit is necessary to quickly detect and respond to potential conflicts.

In summary, reducing BGT can be a more difficult attack, but this is not a flawless solution. However, to alleviate this risk, you still need a versatile perspective that includes the user’s check, improvement and regular monitoring. The Ethereum community should continue working together to create effective solutions to avoid attacks of these types of attacks.

Related Question: What can be done to alleviate the Finney offensive risk?

Finney attacks require a detailed approach that contains multiple protective layers, including:

• User Certification : Implementing strong user inspection processes can help reduce the likelihood of false starts and increase the overall network safety.

2.

3.

In collaboration, the Ethereum community can create effective solutions to avoid these types of attacks and maintain network integrity.

METAMASK WHILE TRANSACTION BITFINITY